Thread

Conversation

Show replies
Level 3:
Good point. This is why I don’t read tech journalism from anyone who hasn’t studied computer science or engineering.
Level 4:
I like to get my tech opinions mostly from medical professionals thats how this works right
Level 3:
This is going up as a slide explaining Dunning Kruger AND irony in someone’s class in the future if we still have one.
Level 3:
If you do not own up to your own mistakes *smart* people will never listen to you again. That is what science does. The ability to see things in shades of gray is also an asset. Maybe not for attention in polarized times - but for seeing the truth in any situation.
Level 3:
In what other industry do I see people confidently projecting expertise on literally every topic they choose to write about? Hmm...
Level 3:
What fascinates me is that you are a professional who has dedicated this part of your career to informing people. To getting things right. Do you think this bias against a certain group of people, and the information they share, makes you better or worse at your job?
Level 3:
Not denying that dunning-kruger is the partial cause of wanting to disrupt every industry, but this is the one incident you got totally wrong. Just own it and move on.
Level 3:
This
Up pointing backhand index
is a perfect example of Dunning-Kruger, though not as the author intended. The sheer inability to admit you (or by assoc your employer - we all know what this is about) were wrong on something so important is mind-blowingly egocentric & unaware.